Global Warming or Hysteria?
Did the global flood (approx. 2348 B.C) occur because of
man-made global
warming? Will this event occur again in the 21st century?
Background history of climate reporting in the
last century
We have all been bombarded with the media lately that man-made global
warming is causing the oceans to rise, droughts, tornadoes, etc.
High school and grade school students are being taught that this is
scientific fact and they should take action. One should be aware of that
for the last century the media has predicted a global climate crisis
four different times--the media in the 1970's was promoting global
cooling, other times it was global warming and they warned that
"billions will die" with lower crop yields. An excerpt from Time magazine in its June 24, 1974 edition
titled "Another Ice Age?":
As they review the bizarre and unpredictable
weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of
scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory
meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However, widely the weather varies from
place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe
they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no
indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming
increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying
may be the harbinger of another ice age.
U.S. Senator James Inhofe stated the following in regards to
journalists' reporting on climate change: "for more than 100 years, journalists have
quoted scientists predicting the destruction of civilization by, in
alternation, either runaway heat or a new Ice Age."
Political reasons for supporting global
warming
Since communism/socialism, the left's system for global domination,
has been repudiated with its 150 millions dead under its system, the
left/elite class have all gravitated toward radical environmentalism.
The ideology has been more effective than communism because it appeals
to our survival on earth. To quote from an article titled "Why all the Hysteria?" in Whistleblower
(03/07) edition on the true intentions of the environmentalism movement:
Environmentalism is socialism revived; the Greens are
the Reds incarnated, writes columnist Ilana Mercer, who quotes economist
George Reisman as explaining: "A global central planning authority is
implicit in all potential international efforts to combat alleged global
problems."
Don't be fooled by the propaganda--it is about global governance that
is ant-Western, anti-democratic, anti-capitalist, elitist and greedy.
The politicians don't even hide their agenda. French President Jacques
Chirac stated the following about the "Kyoto" agreement: "represents the
first component of an authentic global governance."
Is there conclusive scientific proof that
global warming is man-made?
A hundred distinguished scientists met in Leipzig, Germany on July
10, 1996 and released a joint statement:
There is still no scientific consensus on the subject
of climate change. On the contrary, most scientists now accept the fact
that actual observations from earth satellites show no climate warming
whatsoever.
Robert Giegengack--a
Geologist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania--told his
undergrad students at the University of
Pennsylvania in February: "Every single one of you knows more
about [global warming] than Al Gore." The professor thought that
Gore's understanding of climate science was very poor.
James Spann--Meteorologist--stated
in January that he does "not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys
into the man-made global warming hype" and noted that "billions of
dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the
man-made global warming bandwagon."
Richard Lindzen--MIT
scientist and former U.N. IPCC reviewer--called the fears of man-made
global warming "silly" in January and equated concerns to "little kids"
attempting to "scare each other."
Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov--head
of Space Research at Pulkovo Observatory in Russia--stated in January
2007: "It is no secret that increased solar irradiance warms Earth's
oceans, which then triggers the emission of large amounts of carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere. So the common view that man's industrial
activity is a deciding factor in global warming has emerged from a
misinterpretation of cause and effect relations."
Henrik Svensmark and Eigil
Friis-Christensen--two climate scientists--in 1997
presented their theory and its data on a possible link between galactic
cosmic rays and global warming to the U.N. environmental agencies. The
two scientists observed a direct correlation between the levels of
cosmic radiation contacting our planet and low-altitude cloud formation.
The low-altitude clouds contribute greatly to what is known as the
"greenhouse effect". Henrik and Eigil were both ostracized with the
academic community--however; scientists are now paying attention to this
new research.
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper describes the Kyoto Protocol as a "socialist scheme" designed to suck
money out of rich countries.
(It should be noted that land-based volcanoes are the greatest
contributors to atmospheric CO2. Carbon
dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole have been shrinking for the
last three summers, which data was taken from the NASA's Mars Global
Surveyor and Odyssey missions in 2005. The warming trends seem
natural and not man-made.)
Are there monetary reasons for promoting
global warming?
Yes, the corporations have been steered--by U.S. environmental
groups--towards redefining social responsibility and created the Climate
Action Partnership and an emerging Enviro-Industrial Complex. These
radical activists can then use climate fears to raise billions of
dollars. Morgan Stanley with the Environmental Defense (ED) are
trying to promote emission trading systems. This would give ED direct
monetary and policy stakes in the political arenas, banking, investment
and any cap-and-trade or carbon allowance programs that could eventually
be enacted by Congress. Corporate ethics could be redefined by these
radical environmental humanists. Companies such as BP and DuPont could
get money for biofuels, ADM for ethanol, Lehman
Brothers for emission trading and GE for climate protection
equipment.
(It should be noted Environmental Defense (ED) led the campaign to
ban DDT, which resulted in millions of deaths from
malaria in Africa. ED along with the Sierra Club,
Greenpeace, Union of Concerned Scientists and other groups still post
deceitful information on their websites about DDT. They are blaming
global warming on this disease instead of admitting that their wicked actions caused it.)
Recommended resources and articles on global
warming
The answer to the two-questions beneath
the picture of Noah's Ark on top is "no" to both. The earth was flooded in Noah's day because of sin, not global
warming! "The Nephilim were on the
earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to
the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the
mighty men who were of old, men of renown. Then the Lord saw that the
wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the
thoughts of his heart was only evil continually" (Genesis 6:4-5 NASB). "Then God said to Noah, 'The end of all
flesh has come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence because
of them; and
behold, I am about to destroy them with the earth'" (Gen. 6:13 NASB). "I establish My covenant with you; and all
flesh shall never again be cut off by the water of the flood, neither
shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth. God said, 'This is
the sign of the covenant which I am making between Me and you and every
living creature that is with you, for all successive generations; I set
My bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a
sign of a
covenant between Me and the earth'" (Gen. 9:11-13 NASB).